Between the target And the impact Between the coordinates And the crushed little skulls Falls the Shadow Oh! Life is yet bloom and still so short
Between the mission And the massacre Between smart bombs And the severed limbs Falls the Shadow For Thine is the Empire
Between the precision And the primary school Between the seven year olds And the concrete rubble Falls the Shadow For Thine is the Sovereignty
One hundred eighty souls, Gathered on this brink of the swollen Jajrud, In this valley of dying stars. They are not targeted, Just collateral liberation.
The world’s most incisive eyes Are hollow, stuffed with straw, Leaning together, Looking but not seeing, Or just not wanting to see The ribbons in the red dust And the satchels with the little books.
Ninety more must carry the weight, In this hollow land, This cactus land. They carry the weight of the missing limb, The shattered eyes And the silence that screams.
No apology is whispered, No head is bowed in the wind. Between the liberation And the butchery Between the error And the rage Falls the Shadow For Thine is the kingdom of Tyranny
This is the way the childhood ends This is the way the childhood ends This is the way the childhood ends Not with a prayer but a blast.
(With profound apologies to T.S. Eliot—adapted from The Hollow Men and with a silent prayer for the hundreds of little girls who lost their lives or limbs when the bombs came down on them on 28 February 2026)
As of today, the world stands on the precipice of a contrived calamity. The joint U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran represents a profound breakdown of the international rules-based order. By targeting sovereign leadership and infrastructure during active diplomatic negotiations, these actions do more than ignite a regional war; they dismantle the very concept of Just War Theory and the sanctity of the UN Charter.
A Violation of Law and Logic
Under the pretext of preventing nuclear proliferation, the aggressors have sidestepped the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the UN Security Council. It is a bitter irony that the United States—the only power to have ever deployed atomic weapons and a nation currently retaining a stockpile capable of ending civilization multiple times over—is now the primary actor in an unprovoked assault to prevent a hypothetical threat.
Just war theory requires last resort, legitimate authority, and proportionality. None of these pillars are present here. To attack while diplomats are at the table is to acknowledge that force is the first choice, not the last. To carry out political assassinations is to engage in extrajudicial state-sponsored violence that invites a cycle of retaliation, which we are now witnessing as the Middle East descends into chaos. Historically we have seen that this type of unilateral use of force has been the cause of breeding and growth of terrorism. The current situation only aggravates that problem.
The Fallacy of the Global Policeman
A dominant rationalization offered by the aggressors is the tyrannical nature of the Iranian government and its history of internal oppression. However, this argument is primarily inconsistent and legally hollow. The in-house political struggle of a nation belongs solely to its people; it is not a mandate for foreign powers to act as global judge, jury, and executioner. By initiating a military operation for regime change under the facade of liberation, the U.S. and Israel have unilaterally appointed themselves as global policemen—a role that violates the foundational principle of state sovereignty.
The idea that a state can be bombed into democracy is a historical absurdity. If the Iranian people seek to challenge or change their leadership, that is their inherent right and their struggle to wage. When external powers interfere through high-altitude strikes and political assassinations, they do not bring freedom; they bring chaos, martyrdom, and the destruction of the very civil society required for internal reform. International order cannot survive if tyranny becomes a subjective thumbs up for any nuclear-armed power to dismantle a sovereign neighbour.
Historical Amnesia
This historical pattern of interventionism is not an anomaly, but a continuation of a destabilizing doctrine. From the decades-long morass in Afghanistan to the 2003 invasion of Iraq—launched under the false pretences of weapons of mass destruction—the United States has repeatedly bypassed international law to pursue regime change. The 2011 intervention in Libya further illustrates this catastrophic cycle; what was framed as a humanitarian mission to protect civilians quickly devolved into the state-sponsored assassination of its leader, leaving a power vacuum that turned the nation into a failed state, a civil war and a marketplace for modern slavery. The western intervention in Iraq resulted in the country being fractured to pieces and the establishment of the dreaded Islamic state and organizations like the ISIS. Until the sanctions hit hard Iraq was near ideal secular state. What a demonic transformation? Afghanistan marked the return of the Taliban. Dreaded Terrorists have returned to power in Syria too. In every instance, the forced dismantling of sovereign structures did not yield the promised democracy. Instead, it fractured civil society, displaced millions, and created fertile breeding grounds for extremist groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda. By ignoring the lessons of these ruins, the current aggression against Iran risks repeating a history where liberation serves only as a precursor to enduring regional chaos and the global proliferation of terror.
The BRICS Response: Rhetoric without Resolve
The expanded BRICS+ bloc has issued a joint statement strongly condemning the violation of Iranian sovereignty. However, this response remains strategically way too insufficient. While China and Russia have categorized the attacks premeditated aggression, they have stopped short of offering any material or military deterrent. By limiting their intervention to diplomatic notes and calls for dialogue at a toothless UN, BRICS has apparently highlighted its inability to propose a functional security alternative. This disinclination signals to the aggressors that while the Global South may dissent morally, it lacks the resolve to stop the dismantling of sovereign states by force.
The Connivance of Continental Silence
Simultaneously, the response from the European Union has been characterized by a lukewarm, strategic ambiguity that borders on moral bankruptcy. Rather than acting as a principled mediator or a champion of the international legal framework it claims to uphold, the EU has issued hollow pleas for de-escalation that fail to name the aggressors or acknowledge the illegality of the strikes. This paralysis stems from a deep-seated reluctance to break ranks with Washington, yet such subservience effectively signals that the rules-based order is a selective privilege rather than a universal right. By offering only bureaucratic hand-wringing in the face of a sovereign nation’s dismantling, Brussels is setting a catastrophic precedent that erodes the security of all mid-sized and smaller states. This collective silence is not merely a diplomatic failure; it is an invitation to future lawlessness. If the sanctity of borders and the immunity of leadership can be discarded today in the Middle East without a forceful European rebuke, there is no logical or legal barrier to prevent similar military adventurism in other strategic territories. Today the target is Tehran, but a world without enforceable sovereignty is a world where even the quietest corners of the globe—perhaps even the resource-rich expanses of Greenland—could tomorrow find themselves in the crosshairs of a nuclear power’s unilateral security interests. Failure to act now transforms the EU from a bystander into an architect of a new era of global anarchy.
The Need for Urgent Action
The retaliation from Iran and its allies is the predictable result of a sovereign state being pushed to the brink. When the world allows one or two nations to dictate the internal politics of others through fire and steel, it signals the end of global stability.
The rest of the world must react. If the international community does not move beyond urging restraint to an explicit condemnation and active diplomatic isolation of the aggressors, we are effectively endorsing a world where might is the only right. We must demand an immediate cessation of hostilities. The alternative is a total war where the primary casualties are the innocent millions who have no say in the games of nuclear-armed titans. Are we heading into global anarchy? Time is running out.
Recently I was stunned by a video of Shiv Khera explaining why he is not a Gandhian. No one expects anybody else to be Gandhian. Fair enough, it’s a difficult individual choice to be Gandhian in democratic modern India. But the management Guru, chose to denigrate the national icon by selective quotes from religious scriptures to indicate that anyone who is a Gandhian should be ashamed of himself. He also implied that if you are a proud Hindu you cannot be a Gandhian. Even Caesar may have agreed that this was the unkindest cut of all. He was and is a Mahatma to so many not only in India but in every corner of the world. The moral depravity of Khera implying that he was a coward and a charlatan, somehow hurt my sensibilities deep within and like a maggot in the brain it kept growing. There is no peace until my conscience finds expression. Thus this piece.
In watching Shiv Khera’s viral dismissal of Mahatma Gandhi, I was struck by how easily the complex machinery of history is dismantled by the superficial logic of corporate management. Mahatma Gandhi is undoubtedly still a national icon. Every Prime Minister and President of India has referred to him as the Mahatma and/or Father of the nation. Visiting foreign dignitaries are taken to the Raj Ghat, as a national memorial. Plaques there and at many other places refer to him as Father of the nation. Many official sites such as the PMO, the ministry of culture and Press information Bureau often refer to him as Father of the Nation. It was none other than the great patriot Subhash Chandra Bose who first called him Father of the Nation. The Supreme Court of India has observed that while the title isn’t formal, it is a collective responsibility to respect him as Father of the Nation, noting his status is beyond any formal recognition. One of India’s three national holidays is Gandhi Jayanti. His image appears on our currency notes. All this, only to re-emphasize that he remains a national icon. In a democracy it is perfectly fine for any citizen to not accept his status as Father of the nation or The Mahatma. One may not agree with his world view or ideology. But surely no citizen, even if the blue blood of patriotism is not flowing in his veins, should be disrespecting a national icon in public spaces until there is a change in status.
Khera attempts to manage Gandhi out of our history books by using a selective reading of Indian epics, portraying the Mahatma as a peddler of passivity and cowardice. As an Indian, I find this not just historically inaccurate, but a profound betrayal of the very moral foundation upon which our Republic stands.
The Fallacy of the Passive Mahatma
Khera’s central argument hinges on the idea that Lord Ram and the Sikh Gurus took up arms, while Gandhi chose neutrality or tolerance. This is a fundamental misreading of Gandhi’s philosophy. Gandhi never advocated for the non-violence of the weak—the submission of the coward who is afraid to fight. He advocated for Satyagraha, which is the non-violence of the strong.
As Gandhi himself famously wrote, “If there were only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence.” However, he saw a third, more difficult way: the courage to stand unarmed before a charging Lathi, to absorb the blow without striking back, and in doing so, to strip the oppressor of their moral authority. That is not neutrality; that is the ultimate stand, which needs a lot of courage.
The Greatest Mass Movement in History
Unambiguously, Mahatma Gandhi singularly conceptualised and led the freedom movement of India, which many scholars acknowledge as the greatest mass movement in the history of the world, excepting for some religious and totalitarian movements. He innovated and adopted a political strategy which up until then was unknown to the world. In many ways he changed the course of world history in successfully waging an anti-colonial movement and inspiring such movements in many parts of the world.
A great Political and Spiritual Leader
Mahatma Gandhi’s status as one of history’s most influential political and spiritual leaders is not just a matter of opinion; it is substantiated by his global status and honors, numerous global studies on leadership and the testimony of many world leaders. Let us not take this as a congress construct. It is not. Here is how the world formally recognizes his legacy:
United Nations Recognition.In 2007 The United nations General Assembly voted unanimously to establish October 2 as the International day of Non-Violence. This is a rare honour where a global community formally adopts an Individuals birthday to promote their specific philosophy as a tool for political change.
Global Successor Movements. Gandhi’s methods of Satyagraha provided the blue print for most significant human rights movements of the 20th century. Martin Luther King Jr. (USA): King famously stated, “Christ gave us the goals and Mahatma Gandhi the tactics.” He traveled to India in 1959 to study Gandhi’s methods, which became the bedrock of the American Civil Rights Movement.
Nelson Mandela frequently referred to Gandhi as his political role model, noting that Gandhi’s spirit helped South Africa transition out of Apartheid without a total racial bloodbath. The Dalai Lama identified himself as a follower of Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence in his struggle for Tibetan autonomy.
International Tributes and Monuments. Gandhi is one of the most statued individuals in the world outside of his home country. There are over 70 countries with official monuments dedicated to him, including high-profile locations like Parliament Square in London (placed alongside Churchill and Lincoln) and Union Square in New York. In 1999, Time magazine named Gandhi the runner-up to Albert Einstein as the Person of the Century. Einstein himself famously said of Gandhi: “Generations to come… will scarce believe that such a one as this ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth.” I asked Gemini to list 10 greatest leaders of all recorded history. This is what it said before listing out the 10 names… “Defining the greatest leaders is subjective, but these 10 figures are consistently cited for their transformative impact on world history”. At the very top spot was Mahatma Gandhi. AI simply does logical analysis of data available to it.
Academic and Intellectual Influence. Gandhi’s political strategy—using moral authority to defeat military might—is taught in political science and conflict resolution courses globally. Oxford & Harvard University hold extensive archives and dedicated chairs for Gandhian Studies, treating his writings on self-reliance and ethics as core philosophical texts.
The Architect of the Indian Mind
Khera speaks of management and leadership, yet he ignores the greatest management feat in human history. Before Gandhi, India was a collection of 565 princely states and British provinces. There was no Indian identity that could unite a peasant in Kerala with a lawyer in Bombay. Gandhi conceptualised a movement that didn’t just target the British; it targeted the Indian psyche, transcending religious, cultural and language boundaries
He didn’t just lead a protest; he forged a nation. By picking up a handful of salt or sitting at a spinning wheel, he gave the common man—regardless of caste or literacy—a sense of agency. He took the geographical expression of India that the British mocked at and turned it into a psychological reality. We should be proud of him because he proved that a colonized people could regain their dignity not by mimicking the brutality of their masters, but by transcending it.
A Debt of Gratitude
We owe Gandhi our gratitude because he ensured that when India was born, it was born with a democratic soul. If India had won its freedom through the barrel of a gun or the muscularity that Khera admires, we might have become just another post-colonial military dictatorship. Instead, Gandhi gave us a tradition of mass mobilization and dissent that remains the bedrock of our democracy.
To call Gandhi’s legacy cowardly while sitting in the safety of a free country that he lived and fought for is the height of historical amnesia. Gandhi managed the most difficult resource of all: the human conscience. He taught us that true power doesn’t lie in the ability to kill, but in the refusal to be intimidated. As Indians, our pride should stem from the fact that our revolution was led by a man who was strong enough to be kind and wise enough to be inclusive. The great man’s character and reputation will surely outlive such assassination attempts.
Up until modern times we theorised and formulated ancient history through archeology and historical linguistics. Archeologists dug up ancient sites and by the study of artifacts and other evidence from these sites formulated their inferences. In historical linguistics, scholars use related languages as archeological sites, and they dig through layers of vocabulary and grammar to uncover the past. This multi-disciplinary field has now entered the science of Population Genetics and Paleo- Genomics which help solve the jigsaw puzzle with a lot more clarity.
Back in school a half century ago we learnt about the Aryan and Dravidian ancient history of India. How has science changed this old narrative if at all? The Aryan-Dravidian narrative has shifted from a story of conquest and pure races to a much more complex story of deep-time mixing. The modern Indian population is often described as a subcontinent-sized mystery. However, through the lens of paleo-genomics—the study of ancient DNA—we can now reconstruct the history of India not just through ruins and texts, but through the very cells of its people. Modern population genetics has replaced the old labels with three primary ancestral building blocks or three pillars that exist in almost every Indian today, regardless of whether they speak a Dravidian or Indo-Aryan language and regardless of from where they hail in the subcontinent or their religion or caste. So, let’s delve into each of these three building blocks as almost every Indian has inherited genes from all three blocks to a lesser or greater extent.
The Foundation: The Out of Africa Pioneer Group
The story begins with the First Indians, also probably the first Homo sapiens around 50,000 to 65,000 years ago, a small band of Homo sapiens migrated out of Africa, likely crossing the Bab-el-Mandeb strait and via the Arabian Peninsula, following the Southern Coastal Route into India. The migration Size was relatively small and perhaps covered a thousand plus years. Genetic modeling by Narasimhan et al. (2019)[i] suggests a significant bottleneck. While thousands may have left Africa, only a few hundred to a few thousand successfully founded the lineage that would populate the whole of South Asia. These pioneers are referred to as Ancient Ancestral South Indians (AASI) and should be considered as the indigenous people of India as they are known to be the first Homo sapiens who arrived in the subcontinent more than 50000 years ago. It is not conclusively known if humans lived in the subcontinent before the AASI, but if they did, they have left no genetic signature in the population of today. Currently, no pure AASI population exists on the mainland; they are a ghost population whose DNA is found mixed into nearly every person in India. The closest living relatives to this ancient lineage are the Andamanese hunter-gatherers (Onge and Jarawa).
It is also very likely that archaic Humans (other than Sapiens) lived in the subcontinent prior to the arrival of this group out of Africa and possibly coexisted with them for many centuries. Indians today have about 2% DNA of these archaic humans (Neanderthal and Denisovan), the highest for any population outside Africa
The Neolithic Revolution and the Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC)
Between 10,000 and 7,000 years ago, a new genetic stream entered from the west—people related to the early farmers of the Zagros Mountains (Iran). These Iranian-related migrants did not replace the AASI; they merged with them. This Indus Periphery mixture created the genetic basis for the Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC). A pivotal study by Shinde et al. (2019)[ii] sequenced the DNA of a 4500-year-old female skeleton from Rakhi Garhi. The results were revolutionary: she had zero Steppe ancestry. This proved that the great cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro were built by a population that was a mix of AASI and Iranian-related ancestry, before the arrival of Central Asian groups. Most scholars now believe that the Indus Valley people spoke a proto-Dravidian language (their script is sadly still not deciphered)
The Steppe Migration and the ANI/ASI Split
Around 2000 BCE to 1500 BCE, as the IVC began to decline (likely due to climate change and drying rivers), a third major group arrived: Steppe Pastoralists from the Eurasian grasslands (modern-day Russia/Kazakhstan or the Yamnaya culture). These migrants brought Indo-European languages and early Vedic culture. Their arrival triggered a massive demographic shift:
The North: Steppe migrants mixed with the IVC people in the North, creating the Ancestral North Indians (ANI). This is the foundation on which the Vedic civilization was built. The early Vedas written in Sanskrit, have quite a few Dravidian loan words. This possibly shows the affinity/ descend of the Vedic people to the IVC people, who scholars believe spoke some kind of proto-Dravidian language.
The South: IVC people who moved South, further mixing with local AASI hunter-gatherers, formed the Ancestral South Indians (ASI). They formed the base for the Dravidian culture and civilization.
The Melting Pot
These two were not watertight, separate and pure Aryan/Dravidian entities. For the next two millennia or so (from 2000 BCE to 0 CE), they mixed freely with gene flows taking place throughout the subcontinent. It was clearly a no caste bar situation throughout the length and breadth of the subcontinent. Reich et al. (2009)[iii] demonstrated that most modern Indians are a cline (a sliding scale) between these two groups. A person in Kashmir might have 50-60% ANI ancestry, while a person in Tamil Nadu might have 20-30% ANI ancestry, but almost everyone has both North and South Indian ancestry. Population Genetics has thus conclusively proved that the whole of India has a by and large a common genetic heritage. Pure Aryan/ Dravidian heritage in India is something of a myth. There is a certain oneness in the common ancient heritage of every Indian.
The Endogamy Freeze (2,000 Years Ago)
Perhaps the most Indian aspect of this genetic story is not the mixing, but when the mixing stopped. Moorjani et al. (2013)[iv] discovered that around 1,900 years ago, genetic data shows a sudden freezing of the gene pool. This aligns with the late Gupta period when the Manusmriti was composed, and the social structures of the Caste System became rigid. From this point on, people began marrying only within their specific sub-castes (Jatis). This created thousands of distinct genetic groups. India is therefore not one large population; it is a collection of thousands of small, endogamous populations living side-by-side and interestingly all having a common heritage. This rigid monogamy froze the genetic proportions in place, which is why genetically and otherwise we still see distinct regional and caste differences today despite the shared ancient roots. This gene flow freeze that prevails till today gave rise to several deleterious effects socially, economically and biologically. That calls for a separate discussion altogether.
Religion, Gene Flow, and Regional Nuance
Modern socio-political identities often suggest deep divides, but the DNA tells a story of shared heritage. Study after study on religious groups, including Reich (2018), has shown that Indian Muslims and Christians are genetically indistinguishable from the Hindu castes of their specific region. For example, a Kerala Syrian Christian shares the same ancestral proportions as a Kerala Namboothiri or Nair. The closest genetic kin of a Kashmiri Muslim is the Kashmiri Pandit. Almost identical heritage. For most of us it would be somewhat disconcerting that a Punjabi Hindu or Sikh is genetically closer to a Punjabi Pakistani Muslim, than a Hindu from say Tamilnadu. Gene flows don’t recognize borders and genetically the concept of Akhand Bharat is very much a valid concept
There is an ethnic group called Brahui who now predominantly live in the mountains of Balochistan with much smaller populations in Iran, Afghanistan, and Gujarat and Rajasthan. Genetically they are predominantly ANI stock but the Brahui language that they speak today is essentially a Dravidian language strongly suggesting a IVC lineage.
Gene Flow from the East
In Northeast India and among Munda-speaking tribes in Central India, there is a significant fourth stream of DNA besides the three discussed above. This comes from Austroasiatic (AAA) and Tibeto-Burman migrations from Southeast Asia and East Asia roughly 3,000 to 4,000 years ago.
Summary Table: The Layers of Indian Ancestry
LAYER
GROUP
ARRIVAL
FORMATION/IMPACT
1
AASI(FIRST INDIANS)
50000 + years ago
Foundational DNA of all Indians
2
Iranian related farmers
10000-70000 years ago
Mixed with AASI to build the Indus Valley civilisation
3
Steppe Pastoralists
2000-1500 BCE
Introduced Indo European languages; formed the ANI
4
East Asian/ Austroasiatic
2000-1000 BCE
Out of India Theory (OIT)
Also known as Indigenous Aryanism, the Out of India Theory is the hypothesis that Indo European language family and speakers originated within the Indian subcontinent and migrated outward to Europe and Central Asia, rather than entering India from outside. This hypothesis stands in direct opposition to the mainstream Aryan migration Theory. In the academic world of genetics, archeology and linguistics the OIT is largely considered discredited. However, it remains a popular and culturally significant idea. In some sense the theory is valid in that the Indian Civilisation has immense indigenous continuity even before the arrival of the Steppe Pastoralists.
Old School Narrative and Modern Genetic Reality
The old schoolbooks often portrayed the Aryans/Dravidians as two separate, non-overlapping groups. Genetics shows they are more like a spectrum. According to the old school narrative Dravidians were Indigenous people pushed South by invaders. According to modern genetics this group (often called Ancestral South Indians or ASI) formed when the Indus Valley people migrated South and mixed further with local hunter-gatherers (AASI the original out of Africa indigenous people). The old school narrative describes Aryans as a foreign race that conquered the North. According to modern genetics this group is a mixture of Steppe Pastoralists and the existing Indus Valley population. This group (called Ancestral North Indians or ANI) is genetically closer to West Eurasians but still contains significant indigenous Indian DNA.
Key Changes in Knowledge
The Invasion is now a Migration: The violent Aryan Invasion Theory has been largely debunked. Genetic evidence suggests a slow, multi-century migration of Steppe people who intermarried with local populations.
Everyone is mixed. There is no pure Aryan or Dravidian. Nearly every Indian—from a Kashmiri Pandit to a Tamil Brahmin to a tribal member in Kerala—carries a combination of these three ancestral lines. The difference is only in the proportions (e.g., higher Steppe ancestry in the North/Upper Castes; higher AASI ancestry in the South/Tribal groups).
So, in a nutshell we can summarize that the current Indian population is not a monolith but a mosaic of varying shades, a picture largely accepted by the Centre for Cell and Molecular Biology (CCMB), Hyderabad, a premier research institution that has carried out groundbreaking research in this field.
[i] Narasimhan, V. M., et al. (2019). The formation of human populations in South and Central Asia. Science. (Detailed the three-way mix of AASI, Iranian-farmers, and Steppe).
[ii] Shinde, V., et al. (2019). An Ancient Harappan Genome Lacks Ancestry from Steppe Pastoralists or Iranian Farmers. Cell. (The definitive study on the Indus Valley genome).
[iii] Reich, David (2018). Who We Are and How We Got Here. (A comprehensive overview of ancient DNA findings in India and globally).
[iv] Moorjani, P., et al. (2013). Genetic Evidence for Recent Population Mixture in India. American Journal of Human Genetics. (Identified the shift to endogamy 1,900 years ago).
The air was thick with the scent of salt and damp earth as we departed Vakkom. At seventy, my mission was simple: escort my 91-year-old mother, my sister Jabeena, and my wife Arifa safely home after a heart-warming visit with Fathima Kutteema our mother’s cousin, a couple of years her junior.
As dusk settled, a light drizzle began to blur the windshield. We were on a desolate stretch of road, far from the comfort of village lights, when the silence was shattered. A needlessly high speed bump caught us off guard.
Clang
The sickening sound of metal grinding against asphalt echoed through the cabin. I cursed my judgment. I should have slowed down. My military mind, honed by years of habit, went into assessment of the situation: the silencer clamp had snapped. We were stranded in the rain on a Sunday evening, with a nonagenarian in the backseat and not even the remotest probability of a mechanic in sight.
The Shadows in the Rain
As the drizzle turned into a steady downpour, I stood by the roadside, praying for a miracle—or at least a passing taxi. The road remained stubbornly empty. The plan was simple. Leave the car in situ and somehow find a taxi to get home.
Then, out of the darkness, three figures appeared. Three young men, strangers to us, emerged from the gloom. They didn’t just ask what was wrong; they took charge. Without a second thought for their clothes or the mud, two of them slid under the car into the cold slush. One held a mobile flashlight steady against the rain while the others diagnosed the wound.
”The clamp is gone,” one said, wiping grit from his forehead. “But don’t worry. We will fix it.” One youth vanished into the night, returning minutes later with a coil of metal wire—a makeshift lifeline. For twenty minutes, they worked in the mud. I watched, humbled, as these three strangers labored in the dark to ensure a great grandmother they didn’t know could get home to her bed.
My mind went into assessment mode again. These youngsters may be trying to make a killing out of an opportunity. They would possibly demand a bomb as compensation once they could execute a makeshift repair job. I told myself that even so they were angels. It was alright and i could afford it.
A Lesson in Virtue
When they emerged, drenched and covered in grime, they gave me a simple thumbs-up. “It will hold for twenty kilometer,” they promised. “Go now, before the storm breaks.”
I felt a wave of sheepishness. I reached for my phone, explaining I had little cash but wanted their phone number to enable a digital payment as a token of my immense gratitude. One of the boys stopped me. He didn’t look at my phone; he looked at me, folded his hands in a respectful gesture, and smiled.
”We are not looking for money,” he said softly. “We just wanted to help.”
They urged us to leave quickly, waving us off into the blinding rain as if they hadn’t just performed a small miracle. As I drove, the screeching of metal was replaced by a profound silence in my heart.
We often complain about the world moving too fast or losing its way. But that night, on a dark road out of Vakkom, I realised that human virtue isn’t rare—it is all-pervasive. We just have to wait for the rain to see it shine .
REJINCES 