Geography class just got a lot more complicated.

On August 27, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump signed a striking executive order: the American portion of Lake Ontario is officially being rebranded as Lake America. Trump directed Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to update the domestic Geographic Names Information System (GNIS), justifying the change by claiming that the deepest channels and most of the lake’s water volume physically sit inside U.S. borders.

If this sounds familiar, it is because it is part of a pattern. The move mirrors a 2025 executive order that attempted to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America—an effort that mostly resulted in international blank stares.

Silicon Valley Picks Sides

The executive order has instantly fractured our digital maps. Tech giants Google and Apple quickly rolled out geo-fenced updates. If you open Google Maps inside the U.S., you will see Lake America. But if you log in from Canada or anywhere else in the world, it still reads Lake Ontario.

Not everyone is playing along, though. Legacy mapping services like MapQuest have publicly refused to implement the change, choosing to stand by the traditional name across all versions of their software.

The Backlash from Canada

The diplomatic response from Canada was swift and blistering. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Ontario Premier Doug Ford slammed the rebrand. They pointed out that the name Lake Ontario is over 400 years old, originating from the Iroquois word Ontarí’io (lake of shining waters)—a piece of history that predates the existence of both modern nations.

The resistance is not just international; it is domestic too. In the U.S. House of Representatives, bipartisan lawmakers have already introduced the Hands Off Our Great Lakes Act to starve the renaming project of federal funding. Early polls show that a solid majority of everyday Americans are also pushing back against the change.

Hormuz Strait

On September 2, Trump went a step further in that he proposed renaming the Strait of Hormuz to the Trump Strait in the midst of an ongoing military conflict with Iran. In a post on Truth Social, he wrote, “Now that we have it under U.S.A. control, should we change the name Hormuz Strait to TRUMP STRAIT???” Despite active clashes and ongoing attacks in the region, Trump asserted that the U.S. military now controls this vital oil shipping route—a claim as audacious as the proposal itself.

Could the Indian Ocean Be Next?

With nationalistic rebrands hitting the headlines, a bigger geopolitical question is floating around the internet: Is the Indian Ocean on the renaming anvil?

The Indian Ocean holds a unique title: it is the only global ocean named after a modern country. The name stems from the Indian subcontinent, which juts dramatically into the water to form the structural and cultural anchor of the northern basin.

Ancient Greek and Roman geographers officially locked in Oceanus Indicus (Latin for Indian Ocean) by the 2^nd century BCE because India centrally dictated the trade routes, cultural exchanges, and vital monsoon patterns linking East Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia.

No Modern Rebrand in Sight

Despite internet rumors and trending social media debates, there is no official plan or international agreement to rename the Indian Ocean. Unilateral domestic decrees do not carry weight on global high seas, which are governed strictly by international maritime consensus under UNCLOS.

However, looking back through the history books, neighbouring regional powers have tried to pitch alternative names to challenge India’s symbolic monopoly over the ocean:

• Indonesian Ocean: In 1963, Indonesian President Sukarno ordered his navy to use this term to project post-colonial pride and assert naval dominance.
• Afro-Asian Ocean: Proposed by scholar Latif Ahmed Sherwani at a 1971 seminar to more equitably represent the two massive continents framing the water.
• Indo-Pak / Muslim Ocean: Historical alternatives floated by Pakistani strategists who argued that naming shared regional waters after a single country was inherently unfair.
• African Ocean: Periodically suggested by researchers to highlight the deep, distinct historical and economic ties of the western maritime zone to the African coast.
• Western Ocean: The term used heavily in Chinese literature, poetry, and navigation charts during the Ming Dynasty—most notably during the epic voyages of Admiral Zheng He.

The Psychology of Map Wars: Why Leaders Rename Landmarks

The psychology behind seemingly superficial geographic name changes is rooted in much more than mere whimsy. These acts are driven by dominance, symbolic projection, and the deliberate weaponisation of identity. While renaming a landmark may appear trivial on the surface, the underlying mental drivers are deeply embedded in human behavioural science.

The Leader’s Mindset : The Illusion of Absolute Control: Leaders who engage in political toponymy—the renaming of geographic features—are often propelled by a potent blend of hyper-nationalism and an urgent need for immediate gratification. Real policy is slow, complex, and frustrating. Changing a map provides an instant, low-effort illusion of absolute power and ownership. It satisfies a primal psychological need to mark territory and secure a legacy. It also offers a cognitive shortcut: a way to appear decisive without actually solving deep-seated, material issues.

The Populace : Tribal Belonging and Dopamine Hits: For citizens who support such initiatives, the mental state is fuelled by in-group bias and the comforting embrace of oversimplified narratives. During times of economic friction or trade disputes, a bold identity claim acts as a stabilising psychological anchor. Redrawing a boundary triggers a collective dopamine hit—a surge of patriotism that reinforces tribal belonging.

Strategic Othering: These gestures also provide a visible mechanism to other an adversary—asserting psychological dominance over a neighbour or rival. It feeds followers a sense of defensive superiority and tribal safety, reinforcing the idea that their identity is under threat and must be defended at all costs.

The Strategy : Weaponised Outrage and Media Control

Ultimately, these actions function as intentional political rage-baiting, carefully engineered to exploit the cognitive biases of both allies and rivals. By forcing tech platforms to redraw digital maps, the instigator provokes predictable outrage from opponents. This outrage cycle creates a powerful psychological feedback loop:

• Opponents mock or protest the change.
• Supporters interpret the outrage as proof that the move successfully disrupted the status quo.
• The Outcome – a purely symbolic gesture is transformed into a highly effective tool for media control, hijacking the public’s collective attention span.

Renaming landmarks is never just about names. It is about power, identity, and the manipulation of public perception. In an age of information overload and political polarisation, the map becomes a battlefield—and the victor is not the one who controls the land, but the one who controls the narrative.

The Takeaway

While maps of the Great Lakes are currently divided by IP addresses and political boundaries, the Indian Ocean remains secure. For now, centuries of maritime history and strict international hydrographic standards are keeping the world’s third-largest body of water insulated from political rebrands.

By Brig Azad Sameer (Retd)

When Samuel Johnson famously declared in 1775 that “patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel,” he was not denouncing genuine love for one’s country or community. Instead, Johnson was targeting a specific form of political theater: the weaponisation of national identity by those seeking to shield corrupt acts, deflect accountability, or inflate their own stature. Throughout history, whenever power fails on substance, performance takes over. Flag-waving becomes a substitute for virtue, and jingoism becomes an iron shield against criticism.

History’s most destructive autocrats exemplified this dynamic by elevating state-centric nationalism into a totalising faith. Adolf Hitler transformed German patriotism into a racialised crusade, using the defense of the Vaterland to justify territorial aggression, silence domestic opposition, and execute mass murder. Benito Mussolini exploited Italian irredentism, using the glorious myth of the Roman Empire to cover the brutality of his fascist regime and mask its economic failures. In the Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin cynically recast Marxism into Socialism in One Country and rallied the nation under the banner of the Great Patriotic War – a desperate plea to traditional Russian nationalism that consolidated his totalitarian grip and cleansed his bloody purges from public accountability. In every case, intense national devotion was demanded not to serve the people, but to insulate the leader from judgment.

This dynamic is not exclusive to totalitarians; it repeatedly manifests across democratic history as well. In ancient Rome, the Senator Catiline attempted to overthrow the Republic while wrapping his conspiracy in romanticised appeals to traditional Roman liberty. During the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror, Maximilien Robespierre institutionalised state violence under the banner of republican virtue, branding any opponent a traitor to the Fatherland. Centuries later, during the American Red Scare of the 1950s, Senator Joseph McCarthy weaponised anti-communist hysteria to destroy lives and consolidate power, framing criticism of his reckless overreach as disloyalty to the flag.

In the last 50 years or so we have seen this phenomenon coming alive in many parts of the world practiced by astute politicians who lack substance. The latest episode in this long, sordid trajectory is the geopolitical spectacle surrounding Lake America. In late August 2026, amid an escalating trade war and tariff dispute with Canada, an executive order from Washington officially declared that the US portion of Lake Ontario—a shared body of water whose Indigenous name Ontario predates both modern nations by centuries—would be renamed Lake America for federal usage.

Wrapped in rhetoric claiming to honor the contributions of visionary and patriotic Americans, the declaration offers a textbook modern example of Johnson’s thesis. Renaming a shared, historic body of water does nothing to resolve trade deficits or economic friction; it is political posturing designed to offer quick, sensational victories to a domestic audience. It uses geography as a vanity project, wrapping diplomatic failure in the safe, unassailable cloak of hyper-patriotism.

The Lake America controversy reinforces why Johnson’s warning remains vital. True patriotism builds, preserves, and reflects humility in service to a society’s highest ideals. Scoundrels, by contrast, treat national pride as cheap currency—slapping a flag on an ego, weaponising national symbols to silence critics, and demanding applause for the performance. Whenever power insists that bluster is loyalty, history tells us to look closely at what that bluster is trying to hide.

The Residence

In November 2002, our Regiment returned to Devlali, Maharashtra, after a ten-month deployment in Rajasthan. I was allotted a residence—a modified British barrack built in the 1940s that had been converted into officer’s quarters. It featured three bedrooms, a drawing room, and a dining room, all arranged in a single, straight line.

The ceiling loomed about twelve feet high, and the roof, constructed of Kerala tiles, stood another six feet above that. The nights were intriguing, filled with mysterious creaking sounds emanating from the attic. My only real daily challenge was the doors. At eight feet tall, engaging the latches at the top required a buddy. Perhaps the engineers of the British era assumed all soldiers would be six feet tall.

Why This House?

Why did I choose this particular building as the Commanding Officer’s residence? The answer lies in a fond memory from 1987.

While attending a training course at the School of Artillery in Devlali, I dropped by the household of Major Mathew Adipuzha on a Sunday morning. Visiting married quarters for breakfast was a sacred bachelor officer’s ritual, and it took place at this very same house.

During breakfast, Mrs. Elsy Adipuzha had a brainwave: she wanted to demonstrate her newly acquired driving skills. Major Mathew, well aware of her level of expertise, normally refused to let her behind the wheel. His condition that morning was clear: she could drive only if someone else sat in the co-driver’s seat. Suddenly, she had her volunteer—me.

We took our places in the car. She started the engine, pressed the clutch, and smoothly shifted into first gear. Everything suggested she had mastered the art of driving. Then came the horror show. The moment she released the clutch, she slammed the accelerator. The car lurched violently forward, rammed straight into a tree, and stalled. While we escaped unhurt, Major Mathew spent his entire month’s earnings getting the vehicle fixed.

Housewarming: A Clash of Faiths

The day before I officially moved into the quarters years later as the CO, Subedar Major Thangaswamy approached me. “Sir, the Pundit has said there should be a Havan at your residence tomorrow. The auspicious time he has chosen is 5:00 AM.”

“No issues,” I replied. “I will shower and be ready by 4:30 AM so the Gods will be pleased with me.”

I suspect the Pundit wanted to pay me back for all the grueling soldierly tasks I had assigned him over the months, from the Battle Physical Efficiency Test (BPET) to small arms firing.

A Havan (also known as a homa or homam) is a sacred Hindu fire ritual where offerings like ghee (clarified butter), grains, and herbs are made into a consecrated fire in a Havan Kund (fire-pit) while chanting Vedic mantras.

The Sunday morning Havan went off beautifully. However, that afternoon, the Syrian Orthodox Church Priest arrived to bless the Commanding Officer’s home. He proceeded seamlessly through his rituals until he entered the third bedroom. There it stood—the Havan Kund, still smouldering, under the watchful eyes of a row of Hindu deities.

The priest stopped dead in his tracks. “Sir, if you are a true Christian, then you must follow the very first Commandment in letter and spirit.”

I looked at him calmly and replied, “All officers of the Indian Army are trained to internalise and adopt the religious customs of the soldiers they command. It is an inherent part of building trust and rapport. I believe even Jesus Christ would be perfectly fine with it.”

An Enduring Legacy

Even now, whenever we cross paths, Veteran Colonel Mathew winks at his wife and remarks, “Here comes your driving instructor!“

I always smile when he says it. I remember not just the crash, but the historic house that stood witness to it—the house I chose, years later, to be my own. I didn’t select it for its grandeur, but for its stories. It serves as a beautiful reminder that sometimes the best decisions are made not by logic, but by memory—and that the finest faith is the one that opens its arms to all others.

A Surprise After Marriage

After our marriage in 1989, Marina moved into our family home to live with our parents. One of the first things that surprised her was finding my father and mother sleeping in separate rooms.

“Since when have they been sleeping separately?” she asked.

“After our father retired.  Our grandparents too slept separately,” I replied.

Having lost her own mother at a young age, this arrangement was entirely new to her. Decades later, while on a long drive, a radio jockey discussing Sleep Divorce brought back a wave of nostalgia – and prompted me to reflect on our own situation.

What Is Sleep Divorce?

A sleep divorce is the conscious decision for partners to sleep in separate beds or different bedrooms. Far from signalling the end of a relationship, it is an increasingly popular practice used to eliminate nighttime disruptions such as snoring, temperature differences, or clashing work schedules.

According to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM), more than one-third of people regularly sleep in a different room from their partner. The concept has been widely covered in the media, and numerous celebrities have publicly discussed sleeping separately from their spouses.

A SleepFoundation.org survey found that couples choose separate sleeping arrangements for various reasons. Some benefit greatly; others eventually return to sharing a bed. The pros and cons of a sleep divorce likely vary from situation to situation.

Why Couples Do It

Partners who snore, toss and turn, work odd hours, or prefer different room temperatures often choose a sleep divorce. Data shows that those who sleep separately gain an average of 37 minutes more sleep per night and report improved relationship satisfaction – because they are less irritable and exhausted during the day.

The term sleep divorce carries a negative connotation, but for some couples, sleeping apart actually leads to increased closeness and intimacy. For us, good-quality sleep has translated into better relationship health through improved communication and reduced conflict and irritability.

The Benefits

• Better Health: Fewer sleep interruptions, deeper sleep cycles, and reduced fatigue.
• Less Resentment: You stop blaming your partner for waking you up, which minimises daytime conflict.

The Drawbacks

• Requires Space: You need a spare bed or bedroom, which can increase housing or furnishing costs.
• Loss of Intimacy: Midnight cuddling and the psychological comfort of having a partner next to you are reduced.

Working Through It

If you and your partner are considering a sleep divorce, experts recommend several strategies to maintain connection while sleeping soundly:

• Maintain Intimacy: Schedule dedicated time for sex, cuddling, or simply catching up on your day before heading to your separate rooms.
• Frame It as a “We” Problem: Approach the conversation collaboratively.

Marina’s main complaints about my sleep patterns were classic:

• “Your snoring keeps me up!“
• “You hit the sack and fall asleep in five seconds, while I take forever to fall asleep.”
• “If you come to bed after I’m asleep, your movements wake me up, and it takes me ages to get back to sleep.”

We soon realised that we have different sleep styles – and that both of us deserve to feel rested. Marina works in a high-pressure environment as a Pharmacy Manager. She needs her sleep.

No Win

I realised I snore like a helicopter. I also realised I could never win an argument with Marina—because the wife is always right. So, I moved into the guest bedroom, leaving the master bedroom to Marina.

Try a Compromise

If you don’t want to commit to separate rooms, consider alternative compromises: two separate mattresses pushed together, a larger bed, or two separate duvets.

Consult a Somnologist

If disruptions are severe – constant kicking, heavy snoring, gasping – consult a sleep specialist. Treating underlying medical issues can often resolve the need for sleeping apart entirely.

Sex

The most important aspect of a sleep divorce is the one many dare not discuss. We realised that intimacy did not diminish; in fact, it felt better without the pressure of sharing a bed – especially after Marina hit menopause.

Maintaining Connection

For many couples, the only real touchpoints in an otherwise hectic day are the moments before bed and first thing in the morning. If you are sleeping separately, be mindful of how you will get that daily time for contact and intimacy. We snuggle on the couch after dinner or watch a TV show or movie together before sleeping. Being intentional about time together for us help prevent a feeling of disconnection over time.

If you and your partner are on different pages about sleeping together or apart, talk it through. Build in exceptions and compromise. Remember: neither option is objectively better. What matters is what works best for the two of you.

The Cycle Continues

The cycle of sleep divorce continues with us – inherited from our parents, adapted to our own needs, and likely passed on to the next generation. It is not a failure of marriage. It is an acknowledgement that love and sleep are not always compatible – and that sometimes, the kindest thing you can do for your partner is to give them their own bed. And their own peace. And the gift of a good night’s rest.

The Meme That Started It All

On social media, a meme was making the rounds about colonoscopy—or more precisely, about the bowel preparation stage that precedes it. And rightly so. The bowel prep phase, which involves drinking a laxative solution or taking tablets to flush the colon clean of stool and food particles, is widely considered the most unpleasant part of the entire process. Yet it is essential. A clean bowel enables the doctor to identify and remove polyps that could otherwise develop into cancer.

When Should You Consider a Colonoscopy?

It is advisable to discuss colonoscopy with your doctor if:

• You are over 45 years of age.
• You are over 40 with a family history of colon cancer or colon polyps.
• You have noticed a change in bowel movements, bleeding, or pain—regardless of your age.

While cancer screening is the primary reason for colonoscopy, the procedure can also detect other issues such as ulcerations, inflammation, diverticula (pouches) along the colon wall, strictures (narrowed areas), unexplained chronic diarrhea, or bleeding in the gastrointestinal tract.

The Canadian Context

In Canada, routine colorectal cancer screening using the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) is recommended for average-risk adults aged 50 to 74. While FIT is the non-invasive standard screening tool, colonoscopy is typically recommended for those at high risk—such as individuals with a family history—or if a FIT test result requires follow-up. Our family doctor has been prescribing my annual FIT since I turned 50.

In 2022, my FIT revealed traces of blood in my stool, leading to my first colonoscopy. Five polyps were removed from my colon. Colon polyps are common, usually benign growths on the inner lining of the colon or rectum, affecting approximately four in ten people. Mine were benign. Polyps are of many types. Not all polyps run the risk of transforming into a cancer. Only neoplastic polyps (essentially non-malignant tumours) runs this risk. Not all polyps become malignant. Only 5 to 10 percent do and that too, over a long time, usually 10 years or more. But removal of neoplastic polyps are always recommended, to overcome the potential risk. More the number of polyps greater the risk. In2025, I underwent a repeat colonoscopy, resulting in the removal of three more polyps. My next scheduled colonoscopy is in 2028.

Polyps can also be detected by ultrasound scan although this is not the standard screening tool, it is a non-invasive option which risks non detection of small polyps. Hydro colonic Ultrasound and 3D ultrasound which simulates a colonoscopy view are specialised non-invasive procedures.

Incidence of colorectal cancer has become fairly high globally and particularly in North America. Studies have found a very high correlation between red meat consumption and the incidence of colorectal cancer. If you simply compare the global heat maps of red meat consumption and incidence of colorectal cancer, it shows a striking similarity.  The correlation is even higher in the case of processed meat and this type of cancer. The International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC), which is the specialized cancer agency of the WHO, classified processed meat (bacon, sausage, hot dogs, ham, deli meats, and pepperoni) as a Group 1 “carcinogenic to humans” agent in October 2015. This classification was based on sufficient evidence that consumption causes colorectal cancer. .On the other hand it is to be noted that consumption of white meat does not bear any direct correlation with incidence of this type of cancer.  Other risk factors are smoking and alcohol.

Preventing colorectal cancer involves regular screening (beginning at age 45) to remove precancerous polyps, maintaining a healthy weight, exercising regularly, eating a diet high in fiber, fruits, and vegetables, and limiting red/processed meats. Key lifestyle changes include quitting tobacco, limiting alcohol, and ensuring adequate calcium/vitamin D intake. 

Addressing the Fears

Common fears surrounding colonoscopy centre on the preparation process, potential pain, embarrassment, and the anxiety of what might be found. Yet the procedure itself is safe, routine, and remarkably effective in preventing colorectal cancer. It typically takes 20 to 30 minutes, involves light sedation that keeps you comfortable, and is performed by professionals in a private setting. Finding polyps is not a negative outcome—it is an opportunity to remove them before they can become cancerous.

My only logistical challenge was the requirement to be dropped off at the hospital and picked up an hour later. Hospitals do not permit patients to drive for six hours following the procedure—a precaution against the lingering effects of light anaesthesia. I enlisted the help of a family friend, a small inconvenience for such an important health measure.

A Window into the Procedure

During the procedure, I observed the doctor’s actions with fascination. A long, thin, flexible tube—roughly half an inch in diameter—equipped with a light source and a high-definition video camera at its tip was carefully inserted. The doctor manipulated the tip to navigate the curves of the colon. The tube contained channels for air or carbon dioxide inflation to improve visibility, a water spray to clean the lens, suction to remove debris, and tools such as snares or forceps for biopsies and polyp removal.

The camera transmitted high-definition, live video to a monitor, allowing the physician to examine the colon in real time. I watched alongside him. Using wire snares passed through the colonoscope, he deftly cut off the polyps, each one immediately suctioned out.

“You appear to be a master at video games,” I remarked. “You must be outsmarting your kids!”

“I have to be,” he replied with a smile. “This is my everyday job.”

The Bottom Line

If you are on the fence about whether to undergo colonoscopy, have a conversation with your doctor, family, peers, and friends. Sharing experiences and information can alleviate fears and help you make an informed decision. Remember: the best colon cancer screening is the one that gets done.

A Quantum Leap in Gunnery

The induction of the 155mm Bofors Guns into the Indian Army in 1987 was a quantum leap, bringing computing power into the field of gunnery for the first time. Until then, we had relied on cumbersome manual procedures: logarithmic tables, range tables, graphical instruments, and handheld calculators. The arrival of computers promised speed, precision, and a radical new way of thinking.

In our Regiment, I took on the responsibility of training our soldiers on these new machines. Adhering to the old military adage, It is easier to put a new idea into a military mind, but next to impossible to take out an old one, I selected our youngest soldiers for the first batch. The experienced Havildars and Naiks (Sergeants and Corporals) would wait; I reasoned that old habits had not yet taken root in the younger men.

Sepoy Nem Pal: A Star in the Making

The class began in earnest. Among the trainees was Sepoy Nem Pal, a highly intelligent soldier with nimble fingers and a fierce desire to excel. He was the ideal candidate.

After a few days, we moved on to the procedures for engaging targets. I demonstrated the steps, tasked the men with practicing, and was shortly summoned by our Commanding Officer.

Fifteen minutes later, I returned to find Nem Pal visibly worked up. He approached me anxiously. “Sir, it works perfectly when you do it on the computer. But when we do it, nothing happens. Why?“

Lacking a logical answer, I shot back with authority: “It is because you do not wash your hands in the morning with soap and water. When you touch the computer with dirty hands, the Computer God becomes displeased, and you fail.”

Nem Pal rushed out of the room. A few minutes later, he returned and tried again. Fifteen minutes after that, he came back to me, looking entirely puzzled. “Sir, I did wash my hands properly with soap and water. Still, I do not get the desired results.”

That, I realised, was the Indian Army way of handwashing. There was no set drill for it. No standard operating procedure. Everyone developed their own method—or none at all.

A Different Kind of Training

On landing in Canada, gardening became my hobby. Marina always insisted I wear gloves while gardening, but I found them uncomfortable and mostly avoided them.

One spring weekend, we decided to eat out for lunch. As I changed after gardening, Marina said, “Look at your fingers! They are so dirty. Please clean up before we set out.”

I spent the next several minutes scrubbing dirt from under my nails. After that day, I wore the gloves.

The Technician’s Secret

Years later, my career shifted from the military to corporate leadership. While serving as the CEO of a pharmacy chain in Canada, I was visiting one of our local stores when I noticed a young pharmacy technician putting on four pairs of gloves, one over the other.

Amused, I asked her why.

“Every time I handle a different medication, or if a glove touches a non-sterile surface, I simply peel off the top layer to reveal a clean glove underneath,” she explained.

“Where did you learn that protocol?” I asked, genuinely curious.

“I worked part-time at a fast-food restaurant in high school,” she said. “The manager taught me this technique to save us from constantly washing and drying our hands between orders.”

The Power of Standard Protocols

What a brilliant operational shortcut. It was efficient, hygienic, and practical—born not in a sterile hospital or a pharmacy school, but in a fast-food kitchen.

Like any discipline, whether it is operating a sophisticated Bofors artillery computer or maintaining medical hygiene, success relies entirely on standard operating procedures. True discipline begins at home, is reinforced at school, and becomes locked in at university or the military academy. Sometimes, it is passed down by a restaurant manager to a pharmacy technician, where that simple habit might one day save a life.

As for the Computer God? I like to believe that by now, Sepoy Nem Pal has made his peace with Him. Perhaps, somewhere, he is still meticulously washing his hands – just in case.

The 1978 Lecturette: A Case for Co-Education

In 1978, during my Services Selection Board (SSB) interview, we were given a slip containing three subjects for a five-minute lecturette. The subject I chose was co-education.

At the time, Sainik School admitted only boys—though today, girls are also cadets. My central argument was simple: imagine the transformation if girls were present in our classrooms.

My central argument was simple: imagine the transformation if girls were present in our classrooms. Our turnout would become impeccable. Haircuts would be crisp, uniforms sharply ironed, brass polished to a mirror shine, and shoes gleaming. Furthermore, our performance on the sports field and in academics would soar to new heights.

Studying and playing together would help cadets interact with the opposite sex naturally and confidently—a quality I personally lacked. It would provide a platform to shatter traditional gender roles, especially within the defence forces, encouraging cadets to pursue their ambitions without limitations.

Classroom discussions would bring out a wider range of opinions, broadening horizons and enhancing critical thinking. Ultimately, co-education would foster a motivating environment where students strive harder.

Every cadet, without exception, would conduct himself like a true gentleman.

The motive? To impress the girls.

A Theory Untested

I cannot say with certainty whether this theory would have worked back then. In my day at Sainik School Amaravathinagar, Tamil Nadu, we had no female cadets to test it.

However, with girls now thriving in Sainik Schools across the country, I believe the boys are performing far better than we ever did. As women join various Indian defence academies, the positive ripple effect continues.

I like to think that somewhere, my 1978 lecturette was ahead of its time.

Matthew’s parents had arrived in Canada, and his wife, Alice, had just given birth to their second child. Their eldest son, Chacko, was in sixth grade. Every day, the school bus dropped him at the doorstep precisely at 3:00 PM.

The Panic

But that day – the second Monday of November – when Ammachi (Grandmother) glanced at the clock, it read 3:20 PM. Chacko had not arrived.

Worried, Ammachi stepped outside to look for her grandson. By the time the clock showed 4:10 PM, Chacko had reached home.

Appachan (Grandfather) asked, “Where is Ammachi? “

Chacko and Appachan went out searching but could not find her.

The Call

Chacko called Matthew and explained what had happened. Matthew immediately dialed emergency services and informed the police. The police officer asked for Ammachi’s details. Matthew provided all the descriptions and added, “She is wearing a nightie.” Somehow, he managed to explain to the officer what a nightie was.

“A 60 year old lady walking on the streets in a nightie,” it was a difficult pill for the Canadian police officer to swallow.

Three police cruisers soon circled the neighbourhood, searching. And there they found her – Ammachi, shivering from the cold, sitting alone in a bus shelter. The officer gently placed her in the warm car and brought her home.

The Explanation

On the first Sunday of November at 2:00 AM, clocks in Canada move back by one hour for Daylight Saving Time. That morning, every clock in the house should have been set back by an hour.

Matthew had forgotten to do this.

Computers, cell phones, and car clocks adjust themselves automatically. But wall clocks with hands and a face do not. They must be turned forward in second Sunday of March and backward in first Sunday of November – by hand, by memory, by care.

That day, the clocks in Matthew’s home were still running on yesterday’s time. Ammachi, trusting the wall clock, had stepped out an hour too early.

The Lesson

The missing grandmother was found. The family was reunited. And Matthew learned, as many have before him, that Daylight Saving Time is not just about changing clocks, but about remembering—because sometimes, the cost of forgetting is far greater than an hour lost.

A Bold Step Forward

The Canadian government has proposed the long-awaited Safe Social Media Act aimed at online safety, including a ban on social media platforms for children under 16. The measure would create a new Digital Safety Commission of Canada and target different types of harmful online content. This proposed ban follows similar action taken in Australia, where the measure took effect last December.

Other countries are also considering youth social media bans, including the United Kingdom, Spain, and South Korea. Malaysia has enacted a ban on social media accounts for users under 16, while Brazil now requires youth accounts to be linked to those of a legal guardian to ensure supervision. French legislation limiting social media age to 15 was approved by the National Assembly in January, is approaching a final vote, and is likely to be in place for the start of the school year in September.

Proponents argue that such a ban is necessary to rein in social media companies that have resisted regulation, and that it could help combat growing evidence of health impacts from screen use and social media among children.

Unlike Australia’s blanket ban, Canada’s bill features an incentive loop: tech companies can sidestep the ban if they can prove their platforms have built-in safeguards that minimize harm to minors.

How Would a Social Media Ban Work?

Combating online harms for youth is more complicated than simply keeping them off platforms. Regulations must be watertight, and penalties stringent. Social media companies must be held accountable for the harms that exist on their platforms. At the same time, new regulations should not come at the expense of strong privacy protections.

Privacy Risks

Enforcing a ban presents significant privacy risks. Under Australian law, platforms looking to verify a user’s age can either request copies of identification documents, use a third party to apply age estimation technology to an account holder’s face, or make inferences from data already available—such as how long an account has been held.

The potential data collection alone is concerning. To be effective, such measures would need to apply to all social media users regardless of age. It is difficult to discern between a 15-year-old and a 17-year-old by appearance alone—whether in person or online through biometric systems. Platforms would have to increase surveillance to identify user age, resulting in even more privacy concerns.

Evading the Ban

Research suggests many Australian teens are evading that country’s ban, while Australia’s online safety watchdog said in March that social media companies were not fully complying. A Molly Rose Foundation study found that 61 percent of 12-to-15-year-olds in Australia continue to hold social media accounts despite being banned, while 70 percent said it was easy to beat the ban.

Children’s Mental Health: The Case for Intervention

Advocates of the ban argue that restricting access would improve children’s mental and physical health while curbing growing online addiction. They contend that platforms must be required to make their products safer and less addictive for young people—not simply to target children.

The impact of social media on children under 16 involves unique vulnerabilities, as adolescent brains are undergoing a critical period of rapid development. Medical professionals warn that frequent social media use during these formative years can alter parts of the brain responsible for emotional regulation, impulse control, and sensitivity to social rewards.

The Negative Effects

The issues faced by children and youth are also faced by adult social media users. The negative effects generally fall into several categories:

Mental Health and Brain Development

• Depression and anxiety due to long screen time.
• Infinite scrolling triggers dopaminergic pathways, reinforcing addiction-like habits and shortening attention spans.
• The constant chase for likes makes users hyper-sensitive to peer feedback and social punishment.
• Problematic social media use is likely linked to lower life satisfaction.

Body Image and Self-Esteem

• Exposure to digitally altered or AI-generated images fosters distorted perception of body shape and lifestyle.
• Posts that normalise dangerous dieting habits, restrictive eating, or purging put children at risk.
• Cyberbullying leads to depression and body disorders.

Social Skills and Communication

• Inability to read body language leads to frequent misunderstandings in real life.
• Facing a person directly becomes intimidating when messaging has become the default.
• It becomes easier for youth to participate in cyberbullying or exclusion without seeing the immediate damage.

Physical Health and Lifestyle Disruptions

• Late-night scrolling causes severe sleep deprivation, eroding daytime cognitive performance and memory.
• Screen time frequently replaces essential physical exercise, academic focus, and real-world family interactions.

Exposure to Exploitation and Dangerous Content

• Platforms can inadvertently route children toward self-harm tutorials, illegal acts, or dangerous viral challenges.
• Privacy risks result from sharing highly personal or explicit photographs.
• Lack of robust verification on apps leaves children vulnerable to extortion, blackmail, or sexual grooming.

Education: The Missing Piece

Platforms must be legislated to implement steps for youth education on online dangers before they begin using these platforms. This is akin to mandatory youth driver’s education before putting someone behind the wheel of a car. Education to prepare youth for social media use is already part of Australia’s online safety regime.

A Cautionary Note

There are significant concerns that such a ban could become a band-aid fix for the larger problem of social media regulation—by putting the onus—and the privacy risks—onto ordinary Canadians. A ban, however well-intentioned, is only as good as its enforcement. And enforcement, in the digital age, comes at a cost we may not yet fully understand. The question is not whether we should protect our children. The question is whether we are willing to protect them without sacrificing their privacy—and our own.

A Radical Break from Colonial Design

The Indian National Army (INA), or Azad Hind Fauj, led by Subhas Chandra Bose, was deliberately crafted to dismantle the rigid class, caste, and religious divisions that the British colonial military system had engineered. Under Bose’s visionary leadership, the INA established a radically inclusive template – a secular, egalitarian, and united India in miniature.

1. Dismantling the “Martial Races” Class Structure

The British Indian Army was strictly organized around the colonial theory of Martial Races. This pseudo-scientific doctrine held that only certain ethnic groups and castes – Punjabi Muslims, Jat Sikhs, Gurkhas, Rajputs – were biologically and culturally fit for combat. The British grouped these men into segregated, single-class regiments to prevent inter-community mixing and to avoid another unified rebellion like the 1857 uprising. Bose overturned this structure entirely:

• Classless Regiments: He abolished segregated, caste-based, and religion-based infantry units. Soldiers from all regions, castes, and social classes lived, trained, and fought side by side in integrated platoons.
• Unified Messing: In sharp contrast to British camps, where separate kitchens were maintained for Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs to respect dietary caste codes, Bose enforced common kitchens. All soldiers ate the same food together – a revolutionary step that directly shattered traditional caste and religious barriers.

2. Dual Streams of Personnel

The workforce of Bose’s INA drew from two distinct socio-economic streams:

• The Military Elite (Prisoners of War): Approximately 30,000 to 40,000 professional soldiers captured by the Japanese in North Africa and Southeast Asia formed the INA’s backbone. These were trained, disciplined soldiers from the traditional peasant-martial backgrounds of British India.
• The Labour and Civilian Masses: Bose heavily recruited from the Indian diaspora in Southeast Asia – Malaya, Burma, Singapore, and Thailand. This group included wealthy merchants who provided financial backing, English-speaking white-collar clerks, and tens of thousands of impoverished, illiterate Tamil plantation labourers. This massive influx of civilian working-class volunteers democratised the military hierarchy.

3. Religious Composition and Secular Integration

Bose’s INA was a masterful realisation of inter-faith harmony. While Hindus formed the numerical majority (mirroring India’s demographics), Muslims and Sikhs held exceptionally high-profile leadership and combat roles. Key aspects of religious integration included:

• Top-Tier Leadership: Bose deliberately placed leaders of different faiths in critical command positions. Notable examples include General Shah Nawaz Khan (Punjabi Muslim, commanding the Subhash Brigade), Colonel Prem Kumar Sahgal (Hindu), and Colonel Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon (Sikh). The British inadvertently cemented this image of inter-faith unity when they tried these three specific officers together during the famous 1945 Red Fort Trials.
• Secular Symbology: Official greetings, language, and symbols were stripped of specific religious connotations to ensure universal belonging.
• Language: Hindustani – a blend of Hindi and Urdu written in Roman script – was made the official language to bridge cultural gaps.
• Greeting: The secular phrase Jai Hind (Victory to India) replaced religious salutations as the universal greeting.
• National Anthem: The anthem, Subh Sukh Chain, was a Hindustani adaptation of Rabindranath Tagore’s Jana Gana Mana.
• Brigade Names: Brigades were named after prominent secular and national heroes from diverse backgrounds – such as the Gandhi, Nehru, Azad (after Maulana Abul Kalam Azad), and Subhash Brigades.

4. Gender Inclusivity: The Rani of Jhansi Regiment

Under Bose’s visionary leadership, the INA established a radically inclusive template—a secular, egalitarian, and united India in miniature – that gave equal space to women.

In a pioneering move for any World War II-era military, Bose formed an all-female combat unit: the Rani of Jhansi Regiment. It was led by Captain Lakshmi Swaminathan (later Sahgal), a Malayalee Hindu doctor. The regiment drew hundreds of young civilian Indian women from Malaya and Burma, representing multiple religious backgrounds – Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, and Christians. These women were trained in advanced combat, firearms, and tactics alongside male soldiers, shattering traditional gender and social roles in one decisive stroke.

Yet, it appears that present generations have largely forgotten the sacrifices, valour, and devotion to duty demonstrated by the INA’s women. Their stories – of marching into battle, of smuggling arms, of enduring imprisonment – deserve not just a footnote in history books, but a prominent place in the nation’s collective memory. Forgetting them is not merely an oversight; it is a disservice to the very idea of India they fought to create.

The present generations appear to have forgotten about the sacrifices, valour and devotion to duty demonstrated by the INA’s women.

5.  Summary of Differences

Feature	British Indian Army	Bose’s INA
Recruitment Basis	Martial Races theory (selected castes/ethnicities)	All-inclusive (professionals + civilian labour masses)
Regiment Structure	Segregated by religion, caste, and class	Completely integrated and classless
Dining (Messing)	Separate kitchens to maintain caste/religious purity	Common kitchens (all communities ate together)
Official Language & Motto	English; regimental religious war cries	Hindustani; Jai Hind
Women’s Role	Non-combatant / nursing only	Active combat infantry (Rani of Jhansi Regiment)

Epilogue

Long before independent India’s Constitution enshrined secularism and equality, Bose’s INA had already practised them on the battlefield – with common kitchens, integrated regiments, and women in combat. It was not merely an army; it was a vision of the nation Bose hoped to liberate. And though the INA did not win military victory, its legacy quietly shaped the forces that eventually won India its freedom.

If the women of Rani of Jhansi Regiment could do it then, the Indian women of today can do it better!!!

The Unwritten Truce

My first assignment to the Kashmir Valley – along the Line of Control (LOC) – came in 1987. I was a young Captain, serving as the Artillery Observation Post Officer with a Punjab Battalion. Fifty metres across the LOC lay the Pakistani post. By an odd coincidence, it was manned by a Punjab Battalion of the Pakistani Army. Between us lay a few hundred meters. Zero No man’s land. Classic eyeball to eyeball. Despite the 24/7/365 vigil, an unwritten truce prevailed. There was hardly any exchange of fire.

The area we defended was shaped like a tongue jutting into Pakistan, surrounded on three sides by Pakistani territory. Behind us loomed a massive mountain range with a single pass – Sadhana Pass. Local lore had it that when the Indian Army chased out Pakistani intruders in 1948, various mountain tops were captured as our forces rolled forward. The posts were named after the wives of the Company Commander who had captured them. Thus, the posts bore names: Sadhana, Ragini, Bimla, Thaya, and others.

The Companion

Our only source of entertainment was the transistor radio. At times, by positioning the antenna at a precise spot and angle, we could catch Sri Lankan Broadcasts. Otherwise, it was mostly Radio Pakistan. That little transistor was my life line; my window to the world, my music teacher, and, as I later discovered, my secret weapon.

But we listened to one programme religiously: Binaca Geetmala – the weekly Hindi film music countdown hosted by the iconic Ameen Sayani from 1952 to 1994. It ranked popular Bollywood songs based on record sales and listener requests. To me as with most Indians, Bollywood music was a passion. He provided details about the film from which the song came, including the producer, director, and lead actors. Sayani also shared behind-the-scenes stories about popular composers, lyricists, and playback singers.

The most popular Hindi film song programme on Akashvani (All India Radio) dedicated to the armed forces during the 1980s was Jaimala, which was broadcast on the Vividh Bharati service daily at 7:00 PM. It featured Hindi film songs requested by soldiers stationed in far-flung, remote border areas. Popular film stars and celebrities of the 1970s and 80s were often invited to present their favourite songs. While Jaimala was a top favourite, other shows that soldiers listened to were Aap ki Pasand and Bhoole Bisre Geet,

Romance of a Nation

Back then (and perhaps even now) social decorum often restricted the outward expression of intimacy. So, Bollywood music functioned as the primary language through which the Indian psyche conceptualised and experienced romance. These melodies provided a vital emotional outlet, using poetic metaphors of nature and longing to articulate feelings that remained unsaid in the pragmatic reality of everyday life. The music transformed the modest dreams of the salaried class into something cinematic and grand. Ultimately, these songs not only provided a backdrop for love, they also defined the very aesthetic of courtship, teaching an entire generation how to pine, how to woo, and how to find beauty within the boundaries of their social fabric.

A Daughter’s Question

In 2010, our daughter Nidhi was pursuing a B Sc at York University, Toronto. She had chosen an optional subject that intrigued me: The Music of Bollywood Films. The course explored the cultural evolution, history, instrumentation, styles, and societal impacts of Indian cinema’s soundtracks—from the days of Alam Ara through the films of Guru Dutt, Raj Kapoor, and Dev Anand, covering roughly 1940 to 1970.

Nidhi began quizzing me:

“Inhi logon ne, inhi logon ne…”

I answered without hesitation: “Pakeezah. Lata Mangeshkar. Filmed on Meena Kumari. Music Director: Ghulam Mohammed. Lyricist: Majrooh Sultanpuri.”

“Pyar Kiya To Darna Kya?”

“Mughal-e-Azam. Lata Mangeshkar. Filmed on Madhubala. Music Director: Naushad. Lyricist: Shakeel Badayuni.”

“Matwala jiya dole piya?”

“Mother India. Lata Mangeshkar and Mohammed Rafi. Filmed on Nargis and Sunil Dutt. Music Director: Naushad. Lyricist: Shakeel Badayuni.”

“Jane Kya Tune Kahi?”

“Pyaasa. Geeta Dutt. Filmed on Waheeda Rahman and Guru Dutt. Music Director: S.D. Burman. Lyricist: Sahir Ludhianvi.”

The quizzing continued for two weeks. I managed to answer about sixty percent – a feat that surprised even me.

The Secret Revealed

Nidhi wanted to know how I knew so much about Bollywood music. I smiled and revealed my secret: the transistor radio during my first Kashmir deployment.

Then I asked a question with genuine authority: “Why are songs from that era only about three minutes long?”

She did not know. I showed off my knowledge, courtesy of Binaca Geetmala and Ameen Sayani.

In those days, music was recorded on His Master’s Voice (HMV) records. Each record could hold about three to four minutes of audio. Placing the grooves too close together significantly reduced sound quality. For optimal sound quality, three minutes was the recommended duration. The constraint of technology shaped the art – and the art, in turn, shaped a generation.

Luckily for me, this very question came in the final exam and Nidhi got it right!!!!

Epilogue

Decades later, sitting in Canada, answering our daughter’s university questions about Bollywood’s golden era, I realised something: the lonely months at the LOC, the crackling transistor, the voice of Ameen Sayani – they had given me more than entertainment. They had given me a cultural education that would one day bridge continents and generations.

And somewhere in Kashmir, on the windswept posts named after forgotten wives, I imagine the ghosts of those songs still linger, three minutes at a time.

A Grandson’s Demand

Our daughter Nidhi and son-in-law Jay were away on a week’s vacation, and four-year-old James, our beloved grandson, came to stay with us. For three days, all went smoothly. Then came the demand.

“I want my Daddy!” James announced with unmistakable conviction.

“Don’t you want your Mummy?” I suggested hopefully.

An emphatic “No. I want my Daddy!” was his only answer.

I managed the situation with a video call that brought both parents onto the screen simultaneously. But the episode left me pondering: What creates such a powerful bond between father and son?

A Canadian Birth

James was born in Canada, where hospitals strongly recommend natural birth whenever possible. Nidhi and Jay attempted this, but the baby’s position necessitated a C-section. Throughout the process, Jay remained by his Nidhi’s side – as is customary in Canadian hospitals, where husbands stay with their wives during childbirth.

Immediately after the C-section, something significant happened. James was placed on Jay’s chest for skin-to-skin contact. That moment, I believe, forged a bond that continues to this day.

It is Jay who bathes him, feeds him, plays with him, and helps with school assignments. The attachment is palpable and profound.

The Science of Support

Having a spouse accompany a mother during delivery is not merely a cultural preference – it is strongly recommended by experts and supported by evidence-based studies. A supportive, trained partner acts as a crucial advocate, providing emotional comfort and physical aid that measurably improve both the birth experience and health outcomes.

Emotional Support and Reduced Anxiety

The presence of a trained husband significantly decreases a mother’s anxiety during labour. Through reassurance, encouragement, and a familiar loving presence in a high-stress environment, he provides comfort that no medical professional can replicate. This support empowers the mother, helping her feel safe and more in control – leading to a more positive birthing experience.

Training for expectant couples in Canada is readily accessible through the public health system, which offers comprehensive prenatal and postnatal education through both in-person and online formats. These programmes cover essential topics ranging from pregnancy health and the stages of labour and delivery to newborn care and breastfeeding techniques. By equipping parents with knowledge and practical skills, these courses help build confidence and reduce anxiety, ensuring that families are better prepared for the transformative experience of welcoming a new child.

Physical and Practical Support

A spouse’s role extends beyond emotional comfort. He can assist with pain management through counter-pressure on the back, gentle rubbing, or breathing techniques. He handles practical tasks – wiping a brow, providing water, helping the mother move or change positions to aid labour. Research indicates that continuous partner support can lead to shorter labour times and reduced need for medical interventions, including pain relief medications.

Advocacy and Safety

Perhaps most crucially, a spouse acts as an advocate – communicating the mother’s needs and preferences to medical staff when she is unable to speak during intense labour. In busy hospital settings, he ensures she receives timely care and that her concerns are addressed. He helps her understand procedures and ensures her birth plan is respected, facilitating truly informed consent.

Bonding and Shared Experience

Being present allows the father to witness his child’s birth directly, creating an immediate, powerful bond with both mother and baby. Sharing this intense, life-changing experience deepens the emotional connection between partners in ways nothing else can. In the immediate postpartum period, the partner can assist with skin-to-skin contact, help with the first feeding, and support the mother as she begins her recovery.

The Proof in a Four-Year-Old

All this science explains what I witnessed in a simple four-year-old’s demand: “I want my Daddy!” James’ preference was not a rejection of his mother, but a testament to the bond forged in those first moments of life—when father and son met skin-to-skin, and a lifetime of connection began.

In demanding his daddy, James was simply expressing what the research confirms: that fathers matter from the very beginning, and that presence at birth is not a luxury but a foundation.